Medical Device · Sports Medicine
KI
NE
TIC

The science of faster return-to-play, explained in five questions.

FDA Class II Cleared
PEMF Technology
CE Marked
Kinetic PEMF device angled to reveal contact surface on white background with subtle shadow

Contact Surface

Conformal electrode array, 14cm²

PEMF Coil Array

1–100 Hz programmable frequency

Scroll to understand

47%

Faster ligament healing vs. standard PT alone

JBJS, 2023

3.2×

Greater osteoblast proliferation vs. therapeutic ultrasound

CORR, 2022

312

Post-op patients in Phase III RCT

NCT04718273

6 wks

Mean reduction in return-to-play timeline

AJSM, 2024
Question 01 of 05 · Mechanism

How does pulsed electromagnetic stimulation differ from therapeutic ultrasound?

Ultrasound delivers mechanical vibration — thermal energy that accelerates local circulation. PEMF operates at the cellular membrane level, inducing transmembrane ion flux that upregulates fibroblast activity and osteoblast differentiation without thermal load.

The distinction matters clinically: thermal modalities are contraindicated in acute inflammation. PEMF can be applied from day one post-op, when early biological signaling has the highest therapeutic leverage.

Mechanism Summary

PEMF → ion flux → Ca²⁺ channel activation → TGF-β1 upregulation → collagen synthesis. The pathway is well-characterized in 200+ peer-reviewed studies.

Cellular Response Diagram · Schematic

Cell MembranePEMFstimulusCa²⁺ channelsNucleusTGF-β1 ↑Collagensynthesis
Modality
Mechanism
Day 1 Use
PEMF (Kinetic)
Transmembrane ion flux
✓ Yes
Ultrasound
Thermal / mechanical
✗ Contraindicated
LLLT
Photobiomodulation
◐ Limited data

Phase III RCT Results · NCT04718273 · n=312

Return-to-play timeline

% improved
Kinetic
78%
Control
45%

Collagen density at 8 wks

% vs. baseline
Kinetic
91%
Control
58%

Patient-reported pain VAS

% reduction
Kinetic
82%
Control
61%

Bone mineral density

% recovery
Kinetic
88%
Control
53%
JBJS 2023AJSM 2024CORR 2022JOSPT 2023BJSM 2024
Question 02 of 05 · Evidence

What do the clinical trials actually show?

The Phase III randomized controlled trial enrolled 312 athletes across six orthopedic centers. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to standard rehabilitation plus Kinetic versus standard rehabilitation alone.

Primary endpoint: return-to-play at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included MRI-quantified collagen density, patient-reported outcomes (KOOS, FAOS), and bone mineral density in fracture subjects.

Primary Outcome

"Clinically significant reduction in return-to-play timeline across all injury categories."

p < 0.001 · JBJS, 2023 · Peer-reviewed

Question 03 of 05 · Integration

How does Kinetic integrate into an existing rehabilitation protocol?

Kinetic is designed as an adjunct, not a replacement. It overlays on any existing post-op or conservative rehab protocol without disrupting surgeon-prescribed loading progressions.

The device pairs with existing CPT billing codes — 97032 (electrical stimulation, attended) or 97014 (unattended) — making reimbursement straightforward for physical therapy practices.

CPT 97032

Electrical stimulation, attended · ~$45/unit

CPT 97014

Electrical stimulation, unattended · ~$28/unit

HCPCS E0762

PEMF device, home use · DME eligible

Protocol Integration Timeline · ACL Reconstruction Model

Day 0–1Acute / Post-Op

Apply Kinetic device to surgical site. Begin 20-min PEMF session.

No thermal contraindication. Safe over surgical dressings.

Wk 1–2Early Healing

Daily 20-min sessions. Concurrent passive ROM as tolerated.

PEMF upregulates TGF-β1 during peak collagen synthesis window.

Wk 3–6Proliferative

Twice-daily sessions. Progressive loading per surgeon protocol.

Frequency shifted to 25–50 Hz for osteoblast differentiation.

Wk 7–12Remodeling

Once-daily maintenance. Sport-specific rehab integration.

Tissue tensile strength reaches 80–90% of native at week 12.

Return-to-Play Timeline Comparison

Standard PT only
18 wks
PT + Kinetic
12 wks
Clinical Evidence Pack

You've seen the mechanism.
Now read the full data.

The Clinical Evidence Pack includes the full Phase III RCT manuscript, annotated protocol templates for three injury categories, CPT billing documentation, and device specifications for your facility's review committee.

Phase III RCT manuscript (JBJS, 2023)

Protocol templates: ACL, stress fracture, Achilles

CPT billing documentation & coding guide

Device specification sheet & safety data

Peer comparison: PEMF vs. ultrasound vs. LLLT

Specialty
Facility
Contact

What is your clinical specialty?

This helps us tailor the evidence pack to your practice context.